> ## Content Index
> Fetch the complete content index at: https://www.houseofjustus.com/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further.

# Youth Basketball Warm-Up Framework
- URL: https://www.houseofjustus.com/youth-basketball-warm-up-framework/
- Published: 2026-09-25T01:00:00.000Z
- Updated: 2026-09-25T05:47:18.000Z
- Description: A Systematic Approach to Preparation and Long-Term Youth Athlete Development.
- Author: Marsowon
- Tags: Physical Preparation, Youth Athlete Development

## **1\. Purpose**

The warm-up is not simply a period used to increase body temperature before basketball practice. For youth basketball athletes, the warm-up should also be considered part of the athlete-development process.

A well-designed youth basketball warm-up should prepare the athlete for the immediate physical demands of the session while providing repeated exposure to fundamental movement qualities such as locomotion, balance, landing, acceleration, deceleration, change of direction, and whole-body control. Basketball-specific research supports multicomponent neuromuscular warm-up programs incorporating dynamic movement, strength, balance, agility, and movement-control exercises for reducing lower-extremity injury risk.¹–³ Evidence from other youth sports provides additional support for this approach.⁴˒⁵

For this reason, the warm-up **should be performed with intent**. It should not become a collection of exercises completed simply because they have traditionally been considered warm-up exercises.

The warm-up should serve two complementary purposes:

- **Immediate Preparation:** Prepare the athlete for the physical and coordinative demands of the upcoming basketball session.
- **Long-Term Development:** Provide consistent opportunities to reinforce movement competency throughout the athlete's development.

These purposes should guide the selection, progression, and execution of every exercise included in the warm-up.

### Do Athletes From 10 to 15 Years Old Perform the Same Warm-Up?

Athletes aged approximately 10–15 years should follow the same warm-up framework, but not necessarily the same exercise prescription.

Chronological age provides useful general information, but athletes of the same age may differ substantially in biological maturation, movement competency, strength, coordination, and training experience.⁶˒⁷ Periods of rapid growth may also influence movement control and are associated with changes in injury incidence and burden during adolescence.⁸

Therefore, the warm-up should not be separated into completely different systems for a 10-year-old, 12-year-old, or 15-year-old athlete. Instead, all athletes should follow the same developmental structure, with exercise selection and difficulty adjusted according to individual readiness.

Youth Basketball Warm-Up Framework  
  
**Raise**  
↓  
**Mobilize**  
↓  
**Activate & Control**  
↓  
**Basketball Movement**  
↓  
**Potentiate** 

What changes is the difficulty and intensity of the task. As athletes develop, coaches may progressively manipulate movement speed, force production and absorption, unilateral demands, change-of-direction angles, movement complexity, and the amount of information to which the athlete must respond.

The Principle:  
  
**Same Framework**  
↓  
**Appropriate Exercise**  
↓  
**Appropriate Developmental Demand** 

Chronological age can help guide the coach, but movement competency, training experience, and individual readiness should determine the actual progression.

## **2\. The Youth Basketball Warm-Up Structure**

The standard youth basketball warm-up should generally require approximately 12 minutes and consist of five progressive blocks.

| Block               | Duration      | Primary Objective                                |
| ------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------ |
| Raise               | 2 min         | General physiological preparation and locomotion |
| Mobilize            | 2 min         | Access task-relevant ranges of motion            |
| Activate & Control  | 2–3 min       | Strength, balance, and movement control          |
| Basketball Movement | 3 min         | Basketball-specific movement preparation         |
| Potentiate          | 2 min         | Progress toward practice-appropriate intensity   |
| **Total**           | **11–12 min** |                                                  |

The duration is a practical coaching target rather than a fixed physiological requirement. Coaches may adjust the time allocated to individual blocks according to the athlete's readiness and the demands of the upcoming session.

**Note:** The proposed sequence and duration represent a practical coaching framework informed by research on neuromuscular warm-ups, youth physical development, and movement preparation. They should not be interpreted as a universally validated or mandatory exercise prescription. 

### 2.1 Raise

**Approximate Duration:** 2 Minutes

The first phase gradually increases physiological activity and introduces basic locomotor movement. Rather than relying exclusively on continuous jogging, coaches should use simple locomotor patterns that also contribute to coordination and movement development.

Suitable movements may include forward running, backward running, skipping, lateral shuffling, crossover running, and progressive acceleration. The intensity should begin relatively low and gradually increase. Athletes should finish this phase warmer and more prepared to move, but not fatigued.

For younger or less experienced athletes, the emphasis should remain on rhythm, posture, coordination, and control. More developed athletes may perform the same movement categories with faster transitions and greater basketball specificity.

**Foundation Example**  
Jog → Skip → Lateral Shuffle → Backward Run  
  
**Development Example**  
Jog → Skip → Crossover Run → Shuffle-to-Sprint 

The objective is not to make the movement more complicated simply because the athlete is older. Complexity should increase when the preceding movement can be performed with sufficient control.

### 2.2 Mobilize

**Approximate Duration:** 2 Minutes

The Mobilize phase prepares the athlete to access the ranges of motion required during the upcoming basketball session. Mobility during the warm-up should generally be dynamic and integrated with movement rather than dominated by prolonged passive stretching.

Dynamic stretching can increase range of motion while maintaining or, in some circumstances, improving subsequent explosive performance. Prolonged static stretching immediately before explosive activity may reduce acute performance, particularly when performed for longer durations.⁹–¹¹

For youth basketball athletes, exercise selection should emphasize controlled movement through the ankle, hip, and trunk while progressively introducing the movement directions required during basketball. Rather than prescribing a large collection of isolated mobility exercises, coaches should select a small number of complementary movements that collectively prepare the athlete for the subsequent phases of the warm-up.

Suitable exercises include:

- Controlled Ankle Rock
- Walking Lunge
- Reverse Lunge
- Lateral Lunge
- Walking Lunge with Rotation

The Controlled Ankle Rock provides targeted exposure to ankle dorsiflexion, particularly for athletes who demonstrate difficulty accessing the range required during squatting, landing, or deceleration. Walking and reverse lunges introduce dynamic hip and lower-limb movement in different stepping directions, while lateral lunges provide exposure to frontal-plane movement. Walking lunges with rotation additionally incorporate controlled trunk rotation during stepping.

Coaches do not need to include every exercise during each warm-up. For example, Walking Lunge with Rotation may replace the standard Walking Lunge when the athlete can coordinate the additional rotational demand. Similarly, Squat-to-Stand and Controlled Leg Swing remain acceptable alternatives when their movement characteristics are relevant to the athlete or the upcoming session.

The objective is not to maximize range of motion during every exercise. It is to progressively prepare the athlete to access and control the movement ranges required for basketball without creating unnecessary fatigue or discomfort.

Suggested Exercise Prescription 

| Exercise                    | Prescription       |
| --------------------------- | ------------------ |
| Controlled Ankle Rock       | 3–4 reps each side |
| Walking Lunge with Rotation | 3 reps each side   |
| Lateral Lunge               | 3 reps each side   |
| Reverse Lunge               | 3 reps each side   |

For athletes who have not yet established sufficient coordination, the standard Walking Lunge may replace Walking Lunge with Rotation. The exercise selection may also be adjusted when a specific region or movement requires additional preparation.

**Coaching Principle:** Prepare the required range of motion through controlled movement rather than pursuing greater flexibility without a specific movement requirement.

### 2.3 Activate & Control

**Approximate Duration:** 2–3 Minutes

The third phase prepares the athlete to produce and control force before higher-speed basketball movement is introduced.

This block may contain low-volume strength, balance, trunk-control, ankle-control, and landing-control exercises. Resistance and neuromuscular training can be appropriate and beneficial for youth when exercises are properly selected, instructed, and progressed.⁶

The purpose is not to complete a strength workout. Exercise volume should remain low enough that the athlete enters the next phase prepared rather than fatigued.

Suitable exercises may include body-weight squats, split squats, calf raises, single-leg balance, single-leg hinge or reach, trunk-control exercises, snap-downs, and landing-position holds.

Foundation Example 

| Exercise           | Prescription         |
| ------------------ | -------------------- |
| Body-Weight Squat  | 5 Reps               |
| Calf Raise         | 6–8 Reps             |
| Single-Leg Balance | 10 seconds each side |
| Snap-Down and Hold | 3 Reps               |

At this level, coaches should emphasize posture, balance, foot position, and the athlete's ability to establish and maintain control.

Development Example 

| Exercise               | Prescription  |
| ---------------------- | ------------- |
| Split Squat            | 4–5 each side |
| Single-Leg Hinge Reach | 4 each side   |
| Single-Leg Calf Raise  | 5–6 each side |
| Snap-Down              | 3–4 reps      |

**Progression** should come primarilyfrom **increasing the movement demand, not simply by increasing repetitions**. Coaches should select an appropriate subset of these exercises rather than automatically completing every listed exercise when doing so would extend the warm-up unnecessarily.

### 2.4 Basketball Movement

**Approximate Duration:** 3 Minutes

The athlete now transitions from general preparation toward movements that more directly represent basketball.

Priority movement qualities include acceleration, deceleration, lateral movement, jumping and landing, change of direction, and transitions between movement directions.

This phase contributes to a multicomponent warm-up approach that integrates strength, balance, agility, and movement-control tasks rather than relying on general running alone.¹–⁵

For younger or less developed athletes, tasks should predominantly be controlled and pre-planned.

Foundation Example 

- Accelerate → Controlled Stop
- Lateral Shuffle → Stop
- Jump → Land → Hold
- Run → Planned Change of Direction

The athlete should first demonstrate the ability to establish control before the coach substantially increases movement speed.

As competency develops, the coach may progressively introduce greater approach speeds, stronger braking demands, sharper changes of direction, movement combinations, and eventually reactive tasks.

Development Example 

- Accelerate → Hard Deceleration
- Shuffle → Sprint
- Sprint → Planned Cut
- Closeout → Decelerate → Redirect
- Coach Signal → Reactive Change of Direction

Higher movement speed should not be introduced simply because the athlete has reached a particular chronological age. The athlete should demonstrate sufficient control at the preceding level before the task becomes more demanding.

### 2.5 Potentiate

**Approximate Duration:** 2 Minutes

The final phase progressively exposes the athlete to the speed, force, and movement intensity expected during the upcoming practice.

Suitable exercises may include pogo jumps, countermovement jumps, lateral jumps, short accelerations, and short explosive basketball movements. The volume should remain low because the objective is readiness, not conditioning.

Rather than prescribing fixed percentages of maximal speed for every athlete, the intensity should progressively approach the demand of the session:

**Low Intensity**  
↓  
**Moderate Intensity**  
↓  
**Practice-Appropriate Intensity** 

A simple example may include: 

| Exercise                       | Prescription |
| ------------------------------ | ------------ |
| Pogo                           | 6 reps       |
| Countermovement Jump           | 2–3 reps     |
| Short Progressive Acceleration | 2–3 reps     |

A younger athlete may finish with quick but controlled jumping and acceleration. A more developed athlete preparing for a high-intensity transition practice may require exposure to substantially faster movement.

The Potentiate phase should therefore prepare the athlete for what comes next rather than attempting to create the same physiological response during every practice.

## **3\. Developmental Progression**

The warm-up framework remains stable as the athlete develops. What changes is the task demand.

The following general progression can be used to guide exercise selection and progression:

Movement Progression  
  
**Establish Control**  
↓  
**Increase Intensity**  
↓  
**Increase Complexity**  
↓  
**Add Reactivity** 

These stages should not be interpreted as rigid categories. The coach may manipulate different variables depending on the athlete and the movement being trained. Low-intensity reactive tasks may also be introduced earlier when appropriate, while more demanding reactive tasks require additional preparation.

### 3.1 Establish Control

The athlete first learns to establish stable positions and organize the movement. Examples include controlled landing, controlled stopping, basic lateral movement, and pre-planned direction changes.

The coach should observe whether the athlete can maintain an appropriate posture, organize foot placement, and complete the intended movement without unnecessary loss of balance or control.

### 3.2 Increase Intensity

Once sufficient control has been established, movement speed, force production, force absorption, or overall physical demand may progressively increase.

For example:  
  
**Accelerate → Controlled Stop**  
  
may progress to:  
  
**Faster Acceleration → Stronger Deceleration** 

The athlete is exposed to a more demanding version of the same movement problem while maintaining control of the intended movement outcome.

### 3.3 Increase Complexity

Movements may then be combined or performed under more difficult mechanical conditions.

For example:  
  
**Accelerate → Decelerate**  
  
may progress to:  
  
**Accelerate → Decelerate → Change Direction** 

The athlete must now coordinate several movement components while maintaining control.

### 3.4 Add Reactivity

Reactive demands may be progressively introduced as the athlete develops sufficient control of the underlying movement.

For example:  
  
**Planned Change of Direction**  
  
may progress to:  
  
**Coach Signal → Perceive → Redirect** 

The athlete is no longer simply reproducing a predetermined movement. The athlete must organize the movement in response to information.

Reactivity does not necessarily require maximal movement speed. Coaches may introduce simple, low-intensity reactive tasks before progressively increasing speed and complexity.

## **4\. Foundation, Development, and Application**

The developmental progression can also be organized into three practical stages: Foundation, Development, and Application.

These stages describe the primary emphasis of the athlete's preparation rather than a rigid age-based classification. Athletes may demonstrate different levels of competency across different movement tasks and should not necessarily be assigned to a single developmental stage for every exercise.

### 4.1 Foundation

The primary emphasis is to establish basic movement competency.

**Learn the Movement**  
↓  
**Establish Control**  
↓  
**Repeat with Consistency** 

Warm-up tasks should predominantly be simple, controlled, and pre-planned. This emphasis will commonly apply to younger or less experienced athletes, but age alone should not determine placement.

Coaches should focus on establishing movement patterns that can be reproduced consistently before substantially increasing their physical or coordinative demands.

### 4.2 Development

The athlete maintains control while progressively increasing the physical and coordinative demands of the movement.

**Maintain Control**  
↓  
**Increase Intensity**  
↓  
**Increase Complexity** 

The athlete may perform faster accelerations, more demanding decelerations, unilateral tasks, larger directional changes, and combinations of previously established movements.

This stage may commonly become more prominent through early adolescence, but athletes should progress according to competency rather than chronological age alone.

### 4.3 Application

The athlete applies established movement qualities under increasingly basketball-specific conditions.

**Maintain Control**  
↓  
**Perceive Information**  
↓  
**Select a Movement Solution**  
↓  
**Execute** 

Reactive movement, opponent or coach cues, basketball actions, and session-specific movement problems can increasingly be incorporated.

The objective is not to introduce unnecessary complexity during the warm-up. Reactive demands should be appropriate to the athlete's ability to organize the underlying movement while preparing for the demands of the upcoming basketball session.

## **5\. Example Standard Youth Basketball Warm-Up**

The following provides a practical starting point rather than a mandatory exercise list.

The exercise prescription should be adjusted according to movement competency, training experience, group organization, and the demands of the upcoming practice. For a group containing athletes at different developmental levels, coaches may use the same exercise stations while assigning different movement demands.

Block 1 – Raise 

**Approximate Duration:** 2 Minutes 

| Exercise        | Prescription   |
| --------------- | -------------- |
| Jog             | 15–20 sec      |
| Skip            | 15–20 sec      |
| Lateral Shuffle | 15–20 sec      |
| Backward Run    | 15–20 sec      |
| Progressive Run | Remaining Time |

Block 2 – Mobilize 

**Approximate Duration:** 2 Minutes 

| Exercise                    | Prescription  |
| --------------------------- | ------------- |
| Controlled Ankle Rock       | 3–4 each side |
| Walking Lunge with Rotation | 3 each side   |
| Lateral Lunge               | 3 each side   |
| Reverse Lunge               | 3 each side   |

Walking Lunge without rotation may be substituted when appropriate. Coaches may also select fewer exercises when sufficient movement preparation can be achieved without completing the entire list.

Block 3 – Activate & Control 

**Approximate Duration:** 2–3 Minutes 

| Exercise                          | Prescription                                 |
| --------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------- |
| Body-Weight Squat                 | 5-6 reps                                     |
| Calf Raise                        | 6–8 reps                                     |
| Single-Leg Balance or Hinge Reach | 10-sec hold each side or 4 reaches each side |
| Snap-Down and Hold                | 3 reps                                       |

Block 4 – Basketball Movement 

**Approximate Duration:** 3 Minutes 

| Exercise                               | Prescription     |
| -------------------------------------- | ---------------- |
| Acceleration → Controlled Deceleration | 5 reps           |
| Lateral Shuffle → Stop                 | 2 each direction |
| Jump → Land                            | 3 reps           |
| Planned Change of Direction            | 2 each direction |

Block 5 – Potentiate 

**Approximate Duration:** 2 Minutes 

| Exercise                       | Prescription |
| ------------------------------ | ------------ |
| Pogo                           | 6 reps       |
| Countermovement Jump           | 2–3 reps     |
| Progressive Short Acceleration | 2–3 reps     |

**Total Duration:** Approximately 11–12 Minutes

This routine should not be interpreted as a permanent sequence that must be repeated without modification. Coaches may rotate exercises while preserving the purpose of each block. Where time or space is limited, exercises should be selected according to the priorities of the session rather than performed hurriedly to complete the entire list.

“The framework remains stable.  
The exercises may change.” 

## **6\. Modifying the Same Warm-Up Across Development**

A 10-year-old and a 15-year-old may perform the same category of movement without necessarily performing the same task.

For example, both athletes may train deceleration during the Basketball Movement block. The younger or less experienced athlete may begin with a short run followed by a controlled stop, while a more developed athlete may perform a faster acceleration followed by stronger deceleration and reacceleration.

The same movement problem can eventually be performed under reactive conditions, requiring the athlete to respond to external information before selecting a movement solution.

| Developmental Emphasis | Movement Task                                            |
| ---------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------- |
| Foundation             | Short Run → Controlled Stop → Hold                       |
| Development            | Faster Acceleration → Hard Deceleration → Reacceleration |
| Application            | Acceleration → Reactive Signal → Decelerate or Redirect  |

## **7\. Adjusting the Warm-Up to the Practice**

The first three phases will often remain relatively consistent:  
  
**Raise → Mobilize → Activate & Control**  
  
Greater variation should occur in:  
  
**Basketball Movement → Potentiate** 

The final two phases should progressively prepare the athlete for the specific demands of the upcoming practice.

For example, a session emphasizing half-court technical shooting may require less high-speed running than a transition practice involving repeated acceleration and deceleration. A practice emphasizing change of direction may include greater exposure to braking and directional movement, while a session containing substantial jumping may place greater emphasis on landing and progressive jumping preparation.

Coaches should consider the main physical and coordinative demands of the practice when selecting exercises for the final two blocks. The framework remains consistent, but exercise selection and intensity should reflect the movements athletes are about to perform.

## **8\. Coaching Guidelines**

### 8.1 Prepare, Do Not Fatigue

The athlete should finish the warm-up more prepared to perform than when the warm-up began.

Excessive repetitions, conditioning volumes, or prolonged strength exercises should not compromise the main practice. The objective is to create readiness while preserving the athlete's ability to perform subsequent basketball activities.

### 8.2 Control Before Intensity

Movement intensity should increase when the athlete can maintain an acceptable level of control.

Increasing speed does not automatically correct poor movement organization. In many cases, it simply exposes the existing problem at a higher intensity.

However, perfect technique should not become an unrealistic requirement before progression. Coaches should look for sufficient control relative to the demands of the task and progressively expose athletes to more challenging movement conditions.

### 8.3 Progress Gradually

The warm-up should move progressively from general movement toward the highest relevant demands of the practice.

High-speed acceleration, aggressive deceleration, jumping, and demanding change-of-direction tasks should not normally appear immediately at the beginning of the warm-up. The athlete should be given sufficient opportunity to prepare for these demands through progressively more challenging movement.

### 8.4 Do Not Progress by Age Alone

Chronological age should guide coaching decisions but should not determine them. Biological maturation, movement competency, training experience, and physical capacity vary substantially between youth athletes.⁶˒⁷

A technically competent 11-year-old may be ready for a more advanced task than an inexperienced 14-year-old. Coaches should therefore determine progression according to the individual's readiness rather than assuming that all athletes of the same chronological age require the same prescription.

### 8.5 Observe Periods of Rapid Growth

Adolescence may involve periods of rapid changes in body dimensions and physical capacity. Growth and maturation have been associated with changes in injury incidence and burden in youth athletes.⁸

Coaches should therefore continue to observe movement quality rather than assuming previously established competency will remain unchanged throughout development. An athlete may temporarily require a reduction in task complexity or intensity while adapting to rapid growth.

Such adjustments should be considered appropriate developmental management rather than regression.

### 8.6 Preserve the Framework, Not the Exercise

Coaches do not need to perform exactly the same warm-up exercises every day. They should preserve the purpose and sequence of the framework.

For example, a Controlled Ankle Rock may be replaced by another appropriate dynamic ankle-mobility exercise. A planned deceleration exercise may be replaced by another drill addressing the same movement requirement.

“The exercise is a tool.  
The framework determines why the tool is being used.” 

### 8.7 The Warm-Up Is Part of Development

Repeated exposure matters.

If athletes practice landing, balance, deceleration, strength, and movement control only occasionally, opportunities for long-term development are limited.

The warm-up provides a practical setting in which these qualities can be repeatedly reinforced throughout the training year. Basketball-specific evidence supports the use of structured neuromuscular warm-ups containing multiple movement components rather than relying exclusively on traditional jogging and stretching.¹–³

The warm-up should therefore be treated as a consistent component of youth athlete development rather than an optional activity performed before the main practice begins.

## **9\. Coaching Principle**

The purpose of the warm-up is not simply to make the athlete warm. Its purpose is to progressively prepare the athlete to move, control force, and perform the movements required by the upcoming basketball session.

Same Framework. Appropriate Developmental Demand.  
  
**Establish Control**  
↓  
**Increase Intensity**  
↓  
**Increase Complexity**  
↓  
**Add Reactivity** 

  
The younger athlete does not require an entirely different system from the older athlete. The athlete requires an appropriate version of the same system, with movement demands progressively increased as competency develops.

“The warm-up prepares the athlete for today's practice.  
Its consistency prepares the athlete for the years ahead.” 

## References

1. Davis AC, Emptage NP, Pounds D, Woo D, Sallis R, Romero MG, et al. The effectiveness of neuromuscular warmups for lower extremity injury prevention in basketball: a systematic review. *Sports Med Open.* 2021;7(1):67\. doi:10.1186/s40798-021-00355-1
2. Emery CA, Owoeye OBA, Räisänen AM, Befus K, Hubkarao T, Palacios-Derflingher L, et al. The "SHRed Injuries Basketball" neuromuscular training warm-up program reduces ankle and knee injury rates by 36% in youth basketball. *J Orthop Sports Phys Ther.* 2022;52(1):40-48\. doi:10.2519/jospt.2022.10959
3. Paravlic AH, Bakalár P, Puš K, Pišot S, Kalc M, Teraž K, et al. The effectiveness of neuromuscular training warm-up program for injury prevention in adolescent male basketball players. *J Sports Sci.* 2024;42(22):2083-2092\. doi:10.1080/02640414.2024.2415215
4. Rössler R, Junge A, Bizzini M, Verhagen E, Chomiak J, Aus der Fünten K, et al. A multinational cluster randomised controlled trial to assess the efficacy of '11+ Kids': a warm-up programme to prevent injuries in children's football. *Sports Med.* 2018;48(6):1493-1504\. doi:10.1007/s40279-017-0834-8
5. Olivier F, Olivier B, Swart JJW, Hohlfeld ASJ, MacMillan C. Effect of neuromuscular training strategies on injury rates in adolescent males playing sport - a systematic review and meta-analysis. *Phys Ther Sport.* 2026;79:101904\. doi:10.1016/j.ptsp.2026.101904
6. Lloyd RS, Faigenbaum AD, Stone MH, Oliver JL, Jeffreys I, Moody JA, et al. Position statement on youth resistance training: the 2014 International Consensus. *Br J Sports Med.* 2014;48(7):498-505\. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2013-092952
7. Lloyd RS, Oliver JL, Faigenbaum AD, Myer GD, De Ste Croix MBA. Chronological age vs. biological maturation: implications for exercise programming in youth. *J Strength Cond Res.* 2014;28(5):1454-1464\. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000000391
8. Parry GN, Williams S, McKay CD, Johnson DJ, Bergeron MF, Cumming SP. Associations between growth, maturation and injury in youth athletes engaged in elite pathways: a scoping review. *Br J Sports Med.* 2024;58(17):1001-1010\. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2024-108233
9. Behm DG, Blazevich AJ, Kay AD, McHugh M. Acute effects of muscle stretching on physical performance, range of motion, and injury incidence in healthy active individuals: a systematic review. *Appl Physiol Nutr Metab.* 2016;41(1):1-11\. doi:10.1139/apnm-2015-0235
10. Li FY, Guo CG, Li HS, Xu HR, Sun P. A systematic review and net meta-analysis of the effects of different warm-up methods on the acute effects of lower limb explosive strength. *BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil.* 2023;15(1):106\. doi:10.1186/s13102-023-00703-6
11. Matsuo S, Takeuchi K, Nakamura M, Fukaya T, Oba K, Nakao G, et al. Acute effects of dynamic and ballistic stretching on flexibility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. *J Sports Sci Med.* 2025;24(2):463-474\. doi:10.52082/jssm.2025.463

##