Changing Direction

Changing direction is more than moving the ball from one hand to another. It requires the player to redirect the ball and body toward a new movement path while maintaining control and preparing the action that follows.

A crossover, between-the-legs crossover, behind-the-back transfer, or spin can all be used to change direction. However, these movements are not the skill itself. They are different solutions to the same movement problem.

For coaching purposes, changing direction can be simplified as:

Research on change-of-direction biomechanics supports this integrated view. Performance depends on the interaction among approach and exit velocity, braking and propulsive forces, ground contact, center-of-mass position, trunk orientation, and lower-limb mechanics.¹˒² Basketball-specific research further demonstrates that different change-of-direction tasks and dribbling maneuvers place different demands on the body.³˒⁴

Within this curriculum, Directional Control refers to the player’s ability to redirect the ball and body toward a new movement path while maintaining control and remaining prepared for the next action.

1. Direction as a Movement Variable

Direction should not be understood simply as moving left or right. A player may redirect through different:

• Angles
• Speeds
• Ball paths
• Foot positions
• Body orientations
• Control Positions
• Exit paths

A small directional adjustment may allow the player to preserve much of the existing movement speed. A sharper change generally requires greater management of momentum before the body can be redirected effectively.¹˒²

Basketball-specific research also suggests that the demands of changing direction vary with the angle of movement. Studies examining basketball players across different change-of-direction tasks and cutting angles have found that the physical and mechanical characteristics associated with performance are not identical across tasks.⁴–⁶

A player may need only a small redirection to attack an available lane. In another situation, the player may need to reverse direction almost completely.

The movement problem can be considered through:

A useful directional change is a purposeful change in the player’s movement path that creates or preserves an advantage, improves attacking position, or opens the next action. Coaches should emphasize changing direction with enough angle, control, and timing to solve the basketball problem, rather than simply producing the biggest or sharpest change possible.

Coaches can identify success by observing whether the directional change alters the player’s relationship with the defender and improves the next attacking opportunity. The player may create separation, gain a better driving line, move the defender out of position, escape pressure, or preserve an existing advantage. At the same time, the player should maintain sufficient control and balance to continue immediately into the next action.

A successful directional change should produce a functional advantage, not merely a technically clean movement.

2. Approach Speed and Directional Angle

How the player enters a directional change influences the demands of the movement and the strategies available to perform it. Two important variables are:

• Approach Speed: How quickly the player is moving before initiating the directional change.
• Directional Angle: How far the player needs to redirect the existing movement path.

These variables interact. As approach speed and the required angle increase, the player generally needs to manage more momentum before establishing the new direction.

Research describes an angle-velocity trade-off in change-of-direction movement. Faster approaches and sharper changes generally increase the braking and redirection demands placed on the athlete.² A recent systematic review similarly identified approach velocity, braking force, ground-contact characteristics, center-of-mass position, and exit velocity among factors associated with change-of-direction performance.¹

However, slowing down should not automatically become the solution to every change of direction. During a smaller directional change, preserving speed may be useful. During a sharper change, a greater reduction in momentum may be necessary before the player can effectively establish the new movement path.

The detailed development of acceleration and deceleration will be addressed later in Changing Pace. Here, the important principle is that movement speed influences how the player can redirect and establish a new direction.

3. Preparing the Change of Direction

A successful change of direction often begins before the player visibly moves into the new path. The ball and body must first be positioned so that they can be redirected effectively. Preparation may involve changes in:

• Ball position
• Control Position
• Foot placement
• Step length
• Body orientation
• Center-of-mass position
• Movement velocity
• Dribble Rhythm
• Control Tempo

The amount of preparation depends on the movement. A small directional adjustment performed at a manageable speed may require very little preparation, whereas a sharper change at greater speed may require the player to begin managing momentum before the final ground contact.¹˒²

Within the Control Phase, the player can also prepare the ball for the directional action that follows. Through Pull → Organize → Push, the player can position and redirect the ball to support the intended change of direction.

The objective is not to add an obvious setup before every change of direction. Rather, preparation should place the ball and body in positions that support the intended redirection and prevent the current movement from interfering with what the player needs to do next.

4. Redirecting the Ball

The ball has its own direction and trajectory. During the Control Phase, the player can influence this trajectory through the direction, force, timing, and path of the Push. When changing direction, the Push should not simply move the ball away from the current hand. It should place the ball on a path that supports the intended movement. This can be represented as:

The amount of ball displacement depends on the action. A small directional change may require only a modest adjustment in ball position, whereas a larger change may require the ball to travel:

• Across the body
• Between the legs
• Behind the body
• Around the body during rotation
• Backward during a retreat
• Toward a wider or deeper Control Space

Too little displacement may leave the ball aligned with the previous movement path, while too much displacement may make it difficult for the player to re-establish control. The appropriate ball path is therefore determined by the direction, space, and movement the player intends to create next.

5. Redirecting the Body

Redirecting the ball does not automatically redirect the player. A player may cross the ball from right to left while the body continues traveling along the same path. For a meaningful change of direction, the trajectory of the body must also change.

A useful distinction is:

• Ball Redirection: Changing the path of the ball.
• Body Redirection: Changing the movement path of the player.

These two actions should support one another. To redirect the body, the player must manage existing momentum and interact with the ground in a way that alters the trajectory of the center of mass. Research on change-of-direction performance identifies braking and propulsive forces, foot contact, approach velocity, exit velocity, and center-of-mass characteristics as important parts of this process.¹˒²

The process can be simplified as:

The trunk may rotate, lean, or change orientation during the movement, but visible body movement alone does not define a successful change of direction. What matters is whether these actions contribute to redirecting the player toward the intended movement path.

6. Foot Placement and Ground Interaction

The feet allow the player to interact with the floor and redirect the body. There is no single foot position that is correct for every change of direction; the appropriate solution changes according to:

• Approach speed
• Directional angle
• Current body position
• Available space
• Intended exit
• The movement that follows

Change-of-direction research demonstrates that movement mechanics vary substantially across different angles and tasks.¹˒² Basketball-specific research also shows that the characteristics associated with faster performance differ across change-of-direction tests and cutting angles.⁴–⁶

The Action Leg, introduced in Foundation of Control, may contribute to the change of direction by helping the player brake, redirect, or drive into the new movement path. A simplified relationship is:

A wider or more aggressive foot placement may be used during a larger redirection, but it may also increase the braking and loading demands of the movement. A smaller directional adjustment may allow the player to preserve more of the existing speed. Foot placement should therefore adapt to the direction, speed, and movement demands of the action.

Basketball-specific crossover research further reinforces the importance of ground interaction. Changes in shoe-surface friction have been shown to alter anterior-posterior impulse and ankle torque during crossover dribbling, demonstrating that changing direction depends not only on ball movement but also on how the player interacts with the floor.⁷

7. Changing the Control Position

Many changes of direction involve transferring the ball from one Control Position to another. For example:

Possible transfer solutions include:

• Front crossover
• Between-the-legs crossover
• Behind-the-back transfer
• Spin-related transfer

However, changing direction does not always require changing hands. A player may redirect the body while maintaining the same Control side through movements such as:

• Inside-out actions
• Same-hand redirection
• Retreating
• Re-angling the movement path

This distinction is important. Changing Control Position refers to changing where the ball is controlled, whereas Changing Direction refers to changing where the player is moving. The two often occur together, but they are not the same process.

When the ball is transferred, success should not be judged simply by whether it reaches the opposite hand. The new Control Position should support:

• The new movement direction
• The next foot placement
• Ball protection
• Reacceleration when required
• Continued visual availability
• The next pass, shot, finish, or dribble

The transfer should serve the directional change by placing the ball where it supports the movement and action that follow. The directional change should not exist simply to perform the transfer.

8. Re-Establishing Control and the Exit

A change of direction is not complete when the ball crosses the body or when the player plants the foot. The player still has to establish useful control in the new direction.

For coaching purposes, Re-Establishing Control refers to organizing the ball and body after redirection so that the next basketball action remains available. The Exit describes how the player transitions from the redirection into the new movement path. This may involve:

• Establishing the new Control Position
• Reorienting the feet
• Directing the CoM toward the new path
• Reaccelerating
• Protecting the ball
• Preparing the next action

Research commonly identifies exit velocity as one component associated with faster pre-planned change-of-direction performance.¹ However, maximum exit speed is not always the objective in basketball. After changing direction, the player may need to:

• Accelerate
• Remain under control
• Change direction again
• Absorb contact
• Pass
• Shoot
• Finish
• Stop

The appropriate Exit is the one that supports what happens next. The sequence can be simplified as:

This distinction is important because a dramatic crossover that leaves the ball handler poorly positioned for the next action is not necessarily a successful directional change. The quality of the movement is determined by what becomes available after the direction changes.

9. Directional Solutions

Changing direction is often taught through the names of individual moves, such as:

• Crossover
• Between-the-Legs Crossover
• Behind-the-Back Transfer
• Spin-Related Transfer

These names remain useful because they allow coaches and players to communicate quickly. However, the movement should not begin with the name of the move; it should begin with the problem that needs to be solved. For example:

• Transfer to the Opposite Control Side: Crossover, Between-the-Legs Crossover, and Behind-the-Back Transfer.
• Transfer While Increasing Ball Protection: Between-the-Legs Crossover and Behind-the-Back Transfer.
• Redirect Through Rotation: Spin-related solution.
• Redirect Without Changing Control Side: Same-hand directional solution.

Different techniques therefore provide different ways of solving the same directional problem. Basketball-specific research comparing front changes of direction and spin dribbling demonstrates that different directional solutions involve different kinematic and kinetic characteristics.³ This supports the idea that no single movement pattern should be treated as the universal solution to every directional change.

10. Directional Control Is Task-Dependent

There is no single ideal change-of-direction technique that applies equally to every situation, and recent basketball research strengthens this point. Different change-of-direction tests in basketball players have been associated with different kinetic and kinematic characteristics, with some relationships also differing between male and female players.⁴ Research across 45°, 90°, and 180° changes has likewise shown that the physical characteristics associated with faster performance vary with the cutting angle.⁵

Research in elite youth female basketball players also demonstrates that ground reaction forces and inter-limb asymmetries differ between 70° and 180° directional-change tasks.⁶ Together, these findings support an important coaching principle: The movement solution should adapt to the directional demand.

Depending on the task, the player may need to adjust:

• Foot placement
• Braking strategy
• Body orientation
• Ball path
• Transfer technique
• Movement velocity
• Exit direction

The objective is therefore not to develop one perfect change-of-direction pattern, but to develop the ability to solve different directional problems while maintaining control.

11. Pre-Planned and Reactive Direction Change

At the Foundation level, changes of direction can initially be practiced through predictable or pre-planned patterns. This allows the player to focus on:

• Preparing the ball
• Redirecting the ball
• Foot placement
• Ground interaction
• Body redirection
• Re-establishing control
• The Exit

However, pre-planned change-of-direction ability should not be confused with the full demands of basketball. Much of the biomechanical literature on change of direction examines movements in which the athlete already knows the required direction. The 2025 systematic review by Singh and colleagues, for example, found that all studies included in the review used pre-planned COD tasks.¹

Research comparing anticipated and unanticipated change-of-direction tasks also shows that the availability of advance information and additional cognitive demands can alter lower-limb biomechanics.⁸ This reinforces the distinction between pre-planned directional control and the more complex reactive demands encountered in sport.

The first develops the movement capability, while the second gives that capability basketball meaning.

12. Developing Directional Control

The developmental objective progresses from performing a predictable directional change to adapting the movement across different directional demands.

At the Foundation level, the player learns to redirect the ball and body through a manageable and repeatable movement:

The priority is understanding the relationship among:

• Ball direction
• Foot placement
• Ground interaction
• Body redirection
• Control Position
• Exit direction

Speed and directional angle should initially remain manageable enough for the player to maintain control and consistently establish the new movement path.

At the Development level, the directional problem begins to vary:

The player can progressively change:

• Approach speed
• Directional angle
• Ball displacement
• Transfer path
• Foot placement
• Preparation steps
• Exit direction
• Exit speed

The objective is not to reproduce one exact pattern under every condition. Instead, the player learns to maintain control while the directional demands of the movement change.

At the Application level, the movement becomes increasingly adaptable:

The player learns to select and adjust a directional solution according to the available movement space and the action that follows. Defender-driven decision-making is introduced later; at this stage, the priority remains the player’s ability to establish and control the new direction before adding the complexity of manipulating an opponent.

The developmental progression can be summarized as:

At first, the player learns how to change direction. With development, the player learns how much direction needs to change and how to remain in control once it does.

13. Coaching Principle

The purpose of changing direction is not to perform a crossover, between-the-legs dribble, behind-the-back transfer, or spin. These movements are tools used to redirect the ball and body toward a more useful movement path while maintaining control and preparing the action that follows.

At first, the process can be simplified as:

As skill develops, the player learns to vary the angle, speed, ball path, foot placement, and Exit according to the demands of the movement. A successful change of direction should therefore not be judged by how dramatic the move looks, but by what the player can do after the direction changes.

References